Probably knowing that the nature of LLMs is to generate output based on statistical associations, and that they don’t have the ability to look at data and understand it.
It’s also so fucking lazy to do that and then turn around and beg for people to pay you for it.
LLMs generate theses kind of graph by writing a python program that plot a real dataset.
Assuming it even correctly does that. And why is that even necessary? People were able to make graphs before AI. It isn’t hard to do, and the piddling amount of data on display hardly needs a custom python program to plot it.
that’s also the nature of humans.
Thoughts are more than statistical associations, and anyone telling you that you can make a humanlike consciousness through a glorified autocorrect is a scam artist.
The times, and skill level required to make this graph dropped significantly.
Before, you may not even had this graph.
Thoughts are more than statistical associations
Do you even know -how- you think ? Anyone telling you they know how thought process works in the brain is a scam artist, you can’t make any comparison between how work the two because we don’t know how both operate to produce the output.
PS:
a humanlike consciousness
Does consciousness exists at all ? I can argue it’s an illusion born from the ability of self reflection.
Yes. The entire physical world may be an illusion for all I know, but the only thing I can be truly certain of is my conscious experience of it.
There is simply no way for me to doubt my own consciousness as such, but I can doubt what I am conscious of.
What make you think the graph is wrong ?
Probably knowing that the nature of LLMs is to generate output based on statistical associations, and that they don’t have the ability to look at data and understand it.
It’s also so fucking lazy to do that and then turn around and beg for people to pay you for it.
LLMs generate theses kind of graph by writing a python program that plot a real dataset.
I don’t see the issue you have.
that’s also the nature of humans.
Assuming it even correctly does that. And why is that even necessary? People were able to make graphs before AI. It isn’t hard to do, and the piddling amount of data on display hardly needs a custom python program to plot it.
Thoughts are more than statistical associations, and anyone telling you that you can make a humanlike consciousness through a glorified autocorrect is a scam artist.
The times, and skill level required to make this graph dropped significantly.
Before, you may not even had this graph.
Do you even know -how- you think ? Anyone telling you they know how thought process works in the brain is a scam artist, you can’t make any comparison between how work the two because we don’t know how both operate to produce the output.
PS:
Does consciousness exists at all ? I can argue it’s an illusion born from the ability of self reflection.
Yes. The entire physical world may be an illusion for all I know, but the only thing I can be truly certain of is my conscious experience of it. There is simply no way for me to doubt my own consciousness as such, but I can doubt what I am conscious of.