• irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Usage is rising because corporate executives started getting kickbacks and thinking they could cut staff by implementing it. But developers who have actually had to use it have realized it can be useful in a few scenarios, but requires a ton of review of anything it writes because it rarely understands context and often makes mistakes that are really hard to debug because they are subtle. So anyone trying to use it for a language or system they don’t understand well is going to have a hard time.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s just Markov chains running on a heap of poorly governed sources. Expensive because Markov chains are brutish to process. The only intelligence is in the source they calculate on. Literally a basic “what goes in comes out” math process.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Counterpoint: they want number go up.

      Pro Tip: it doesn’t even matter if number go up, when they know how to suck up to even higher-ups.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s not true. If you give it context, it understands and retains context quite well. The thing is that you can’t just say “write code for me” and expect it to work.

      Also, certain models are better than certain tasks than others.