• blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the payroll tax would apply equally to all workers while funding transit, yes? In this case, it functions as an incentive for all people to take transit, since they have already paid for it.

    On the whole, this looks like a great step in the right direction. Sure, it could be better - but dont let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

    • hypeerror@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Payroll taxes are notoriously regressive. The wealthy can easily dodge salary as capital gains. Even then payroll taxes usually have a cap at some value so the most you could collect from a person getting a 7 figure salary is .02% of the first 100k or whatever the cap is at.

      The stiff working at autozone will pay .02% of his gross paycheck.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        A fair point. If presented as a package, I would still support these propositions, though. Like, ideally I want everything funded via land value and pigouvian taxes - but I’ll take my wins where I can get them.