• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I dunno why people even care about this bullshit pseudo-science. The study is dumb AF. The dude didn’t even use real resumes. He had an LLM generate TEN fake resumes and then the “result” is still within any reasonable margin of error. Reading this article is like watching a clown show.

    It’s all phony smoke and mirrors. Clickbait. The usual “AI” grift.

    • kozy138@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I feel as though generating these “fake” resumes is one of the top uses for LLMs. Millions of people are probably using LLMs to write their own resumes, so generating random ones seems on par with reality.