Definitely has his grip on reality, this one

  • fishy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s the stoplight’s fault! Ban stop signs, traffic lights and remove speed limits and we’ll never have gridlock again!!!

    • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m unironically all for removing stop signs, traffic lights, and speed limits. If you build streets and roads properly, you don’t need those, frequently ignored, control devices.

      It would remove gridlock, but not necessarily congestion.

        • oo1@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          As an often pedestrian, i often prefer lights. If it’s a busy dual carriageway roundabout It can often be hard to route pedestrians across. You end up with elaborate and winding pedestrian subways.

          Roundabouts are ok on rural junctions, but round here we often have to have traffic lights on roundabouts as you start to get closer in to urban areas - and they do seem to help flow.

          I just don’t believe road design alone can remove the need for coordination as population density gets above a certain level. Fuck in central London you need traffic lights just to coordinate all the buses never mind cars. Of course they need an overhead s-bahn type light rail system there though, but planning rules/landowners won’t allow it. At this point they just need less people - but again the govt/electorate/landowners won’t allow that because they’re all a bunch of tw4ts.

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            As Jason Slaughter (Not Just Bikes) says—and I agree—any city street with more than one car lane in each direction is an abject failure of urban planning. Multi-lane roundabouts should never exist in places where people are expected to walk.

            If enough people are going the same direction at the same time that they need more than one lane for cars, then that’s the perfect route for transit.

        • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Round abouts, peanuts, uncontrolled, yielded, modal filtered, raised, edged, sunken, and more.

          There are a lot of ways to give clear cues to all road users on what to do, and how to do it, without relying on signage. Traffic lights in particular are extremely low throughput; their primary advantage is allowing vehicles to drive really fast between intersections, so they are great for roads/highways but not for streets.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ok with that, but you also need to remove other cars from the road. Every time I’ve been stuck in traffic, it was because there were so many other cars. This has got out of control! Who are all these people and where are they all going?!?

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      All these bums without cars trying to cross the road made me late! Do they really need a crossing every five blocks? /S