• psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Demand money for their work? THE AUDACITY OF THEM BITCH, THEY SHOULD WORK FOR FREE.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. They create derivations of content they consumed prior. Most of them will even post their “inspirations” along with their derivations. And no one gives a shit.

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Other people have used the words you wrote in other contexts before, therefore you stole their words.

      Oh God, so did I! I’m doing it right now! I’m going to jail!

    • ekZepp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If is shit, then stop consuming it. (no movies, no comics, no series, no books, NO ART)

      OR

      If is worthless then anyone can easily do it. Just create that yourself, BUT without using a program who steal and mix-up previous artworks. You don’t need that, right?

      But ofk you work for free, right?

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t really. I don’t go to or buy any of those. Haven’t in decades. “Artists” like to think WAAAAAAY to highly of themselves and their work.

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t consume “art” from people who complain about AI “art” as I don’t buy furry commissions.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s a fundamental difference between a person learning from other people, and machines learning from other people, because the latter can be copied infinitely. One person can only generate so much output, while the machine can be scaled horizontally.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Irrelevant Human exceptionalism. Just because something is copyable doesn’t inherently make it worse. Just as something being difficult to obtain doesn’t make it inherently better.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          “Irrelevant human exceptionalism”? Sorry I don’t want creatives to starve while a few rich people get ever richer.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Artists demanding money: “YOU BETTER PAY ME FOR THIS STUFF OR ELSE I’M GONNA… gonna… Idk, keep making it for free I guess?”