• 0 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 17th, 2024

help-circle






  • The alternative would really fuck up your jobs is the thing. Yes commuting sucks and the issue of being forced to commute is a waste of reources, time, and just a show of power.

    Until you realize opening that kraken of questions will just lead to worse job disparity. Physical space usually demands physical effort and labor, a basic sense of meeting one another in an AI infested world. You’ll be competing in the same market for jobs, just your boss has a bigger pool and you’re just as small.


  • My cult? It’s simple buddhist, sikh (hindu/islam), christian (judist), and animist beliefs.

    It’s the core tenet of daoism or even japanese empirial shinto.

    You are born and you are raised through the suffering of your parents. The world gave something up to form you, what it gave forms you.

    It gave me hate and nothing, my mother clawed me out of hell at exploitational wages. 80ish hours for a 100$ in 2012. So yes I agree with your want of change, however I feel your want of change is a bit naïve.

    You do not make wanton change without deep seeded policy. Have you yourself even acknowledge your benefits as much as you do your change and disdain for the now?





  • By this idea of job structure, Trump is doing great. He is working purely for pursuits and not to worry about paying rent. So I have to disagree, your goal is much to simple to observe intricacies.

    However, I personally disagree and believe that he is doing very little work. I would much rather have actual education reform to allow freeflowing access of jobs. Incentivizing self growth through fair access and credentials. *Edit. Now realizing this can in turn downplay the actual learning of social sciences which I feel is crucial to acknowledge intricate subjects like the aforementioned.

    This is a crucial acknowledgement that I feel is essential to making your idea fruitful.





  • Self promotion and sex sells. Along with a bit of superiority and contemporary absurdism.

    It’s funny because it’s a lady who’s aesthetic stems from a very self detrimental culture. Objectified and then sold to the masses as a fetish. Which then is promoting the same ‘shaming’ that the culture itself was born from. However because it can be worded in equally absurd terms, it comes across as comical. In a pathetic kind of way. The way any normal person can just be baffled by.

    3m ago, 1 like, and the other things hidden.