Thanks for the source.

What other states other than California has it?

Maybe denial is the new word for club?

Again, I said it depends on location. I’m not talking about the US here, and there are no Doordash or Uber Eats where I’m from.

Edit: According to this study (Link), in the UK, about 83% of delivery drivers use mopeds. The UK does have Uber Eats.

You’re right, but that’s wanting something that the guy you’re replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn’t solve the problem.

An extreme counterexample is required in response to your extreme mischaracterization of the guy’s argument. I’m just continuing down your logic of exaggerating the argument to the point of being nonsensical. It turns out you only like it when you do it to other people, but not when its done to you.

So did you hunt for your dinner last night?

Your gatekeeping sounds more like a Reddit attitude than what he said.

That just means the place you live has a serious car dependency problem.

That is, again, depending on the location. Where I’m from, the large majority of food deliveries are done on a moped.

It would, because desktop users are a lot easier to infect than servers. They might be a lot less valuable than servers, but at the same time, they are much less secure. I’m sure there are plenty of people who would prefer going for the easier targets if there is enough of them to make up for the smaller value.

What makes you think this doesn’t apply to Mastodon instances?

That article has a lot of reaching between the proof it claims and its conclusion.

Yeah, it does make it racist, but which party is performing the racist act? The AI, the AI trainer, the data collector, or the system that prioritises white patients? That’s the important distinction that simply calling it racist fails to address.

Haha, don’t project your own problems onto me, man.

You’re still confusing the two sentences. Haah, why do I even bother?

Can you not tell the difference between the sentence “blame him for being a man” with “blame all his problems on him being a man”?

True, both are sexist, but they literally mean different things. You’re just proving again how you can’t read.

Try reading from the start again, and maybe you’d finally be able to grasp some form of understanding. Good luck.

You really can’t read, can you? My comment is simple enough it would take a cock-up of epic proportions to not get my point.

You’re pissy, jaded and uncomfortable with the concept of being wrong. Classic men shit.

Here you go.