WYGIWYG

  • 0 Posts
  • 636 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 24th, 2024

help-circle
  • At a minimum, It has stealing, privacy, wage theft, power comsumption, and hardware scarcity issues.

    Taking a couple of those away would help. A large part is the fear that it’s taking away our livelihoods, and it’s not even really good at it. It’s also polluting and running on enough pirated data that we’d be sent to prison forever if we, as individuals tried it.

    It shines at assisting professionals in specific fields, reading things like body scans, blood tests, and patient histories, and finding correlations. It’s good at helping DevOps/IT people who have to rarely maintain a bunch of oddball systems. It’s decent at finding inconsistencies in code documentation and documenting code that isn’t documented.

    It’s bad at art compared to an artist It’s good at art compared to an average electrician.

    It’s good at taking work from artists, making side money on Fiverr. It’s great at marketing to CEO’s.

    There’s a lot more there than social issues.




  • He’s not talking about 80/20 limits. he’s talking about material breakdown at extremes. Not all manufacturers spec in 80/20 limits. AFAIK, only Samsung actually lets you stop it completely at 80, the rest just try to let it sit no higher than 80 all night.

    If they were saccrificing 40% of runtime to keep you from having to replace your battery, that would 100% be in the sales pitch.

    And honestly, that article isn’t a great source of truth. A number of the statements in there are inaccurate or, at the very least, misleading.

    Charging beyond 100% or below 0% is mostly BS. The proper max voltage of the battery is a physics thing, they are in equilibrium at 4.7 / cell. Picking at a low power limit is up to the manufacturer and their choice in power distribution circuitry. He asked the chemist if you could overcharge or overdischarge a battery and mistook that as an answer that it was feasible to overcharge/overdischarge them.

    “Leaving a charger plugged in at the wall and turned on wastes energy False (well, maybe a tiny bit)” This is still true for many chargers, and calling it out as a little bit in his own arbitrary numbers is disingenuous.

    “Batteries perform worse when they’re cold False (mostly)”

    Rest assured, your C rating is wildly affected by temperature; he’s trying to again call it out as slight, which is making his own narrative.

    “Powering off a device occasionally helps preserve battery life False”

    The whole time your phone is on, you are charging or discharging. Those cycles wear on the battery any time you shut your phone off, you are in the least damaging mode for your battery, especially if it’s around 50% or so.

    “Using an unofficial charger damages your phone True”

    100% BS, using a crappy charger might damage your phone. Buying a quality 3rd party chager is no problem at all.

    The author doesn’t appear to have a strong electronics background and he didn’t ask the right questions or fully understand the importat parts of the answers

    “And if too much current is delivered to a battery, that could mean ripping out too many of those lithium ions and leading to the same kind of degradation you read about earlier. That’s not to say that all off-brand chargers will be this bad, Griffith notes, but you’re still probably better off sticking with an official model.” is not the same as “Using an unofficial charger damages your phone”









  • The best description I’ve ever heard about getting very old, it’s like being in a nice hot shower all your life and as you near the end, they just keep slowly turning off the hot water until you’re miserable. We just kinda fall apart in old age. The only future you’re looking forward to is your family reaching their own milestones, unless you’re financially prepared, your income dwindles. I’m sure it’s not like that for everyone, but at least in my circles, panel for is more like “I’m scared, but you know it’s about time”


  • That only covers games that are loosely using servers for communication, piracy and cheating. That also puts game companies into the realm of losing their IP if they shut down temporarily in an acquisition. If you start a studio, run out of cash and get aquired, you’ll actually want that game you made to still be worth something, it doesn’t just affect those AAA players.

    I think you need to add something like an escrow with x months of running costs. Once that well runs dry you need to go down to the providing a working server. I’ve been through the industry and I can confidently tell you that an API isn’t enough for a hell of a lot of games. Some of the stuff I’ve seen, it would take the actual game team a half a year to bring it back up with the source because the stuff they were using when they went under was ancient. You don’t want to buy a server authoratative game and wait around a year while the community tries to ressurect it.