Why would you want to spend more time thinking about a dead site?

Maybe a few in Switzerland. I haven’t seen any news about it specifically.

You don’t have to. You can use cash, checks, crypto, gift cards, and more. It’s only credit cards (and probably almost all debit cards) that go through them.

Keep calling. Tell your friends. It’s already gotten MasterCard’s attention enough to make a statement.

True, but I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that. I don’t think it should. A malicious extension could do horrible things.

How does adding AI help their funding?

Same. But that shouldn’t be a factor in a professional publication.

For most people, that’s an acceptable trade, because they don’t want to maintain a library. And with Spotify, you get access to a much larger library than you could ever possibly keep.

Nope. It should be reviewed by a human, and the response should be proportionate.

Why maddening? The active shooter response shouldn’t be all that different.

I don’t see any description of said conduct in the article. What is he referring to?

SEO garbage has been around for much more than a decade. In fact, before Google got really good at search ranking, sites easily gamed the search engines.

I click the links to the source on the relevant part.

*facetious

I’ve been doing that since they overturned Roe.

Leave? And go where? Neither emigrating nor immigrating are easy tasks. I’d rather stay and fight.

Maybe. For photographs, it’s definitely not unconstitutional to make it illegal, because people have a right to privacy (4th amendment sort of, and 10th because they’re state laws).

For Trump, and for non-photographic media, it’s a little different. For one, he’s a very public figure. Another, you could argue it’s artistic, satirical, or critical of him.

Now if you were doing it maliciously, with intent to harass him personally, then yeah that would probably be considered not protected and carry civil or criminal liability.

Yes, but that wording is misleading. Typical web discovery happens when a crawler finds a published link. It sounds like in this case, they’re just giving each and every share link to Google etc, even if the link is not posted anywhere public.