Stamets@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoChad rulelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1800arrow-down119
arrow-up1781arrow-down1external-linkChad rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareClent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 hours agoThe issue here is still you thinking I’m offended. I’m not. You continue to insist I am and insist you know my motivations. You and I disagree I what a bad person is. I can accept that. Why can’t you? I posted this knowing it would get called out. Literally just said that. It appears you’ve having trouble understanding what I am saying. I think this makes you a bad person. If you disagree then by your own rules that makes you childish. Does this help you see the fallacy of your logic?
minus-squareUrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 hours agoYou’re not offended, you just continuously respond defending someone who would theoretically be offended. Got it
The issue here is still you thinking I’m offended. I’m not. You continue to insist I am and insist you know my motivations.
You and I disagree I what a bad person is. I can accept that. Why can’t you?
I posted this knowing it would get called out. Literally just said that. It appears you’ve having trouble understanding what I am saying.
I think this makes you a bad person. If you disagree then by your own rules that makes you childish. Does this help you see the fallacy of your logic?
You’re not offended, you just continuously respond defending someone who would theoretically be offended.
Got it